Forum
  Classifieds
  News
  Localband
  Shows
  Show Pics
  Polls

  OT Threads
  Other News
  Movies
  VideoGames
  Videos
  TV
  Sports
  Gear
  /r/
  Food

  New Thread
  New Poll

E-mail

New site? Maybe some day.

Username:

SPAM Filter: re-type this

(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)

Message:

UBB enabled. HTML disabled Spam Filtering enabledIcons: (click image to insert) Show All - pop

b i u add: url image video(?)

:	post by Joe/NotCommon at 2004-11-02 14:35:18

Someone on my myspace list sent this bulletin:

Why Badnarik?

As a Libertarian who opposed the Iraq war and the USA PATRIOT Act, I am voting for Libertarian Michael Badnarik. Those of us who opposed the war and the policies of this Justice Department have little reason to vote for John Kerry, who also supported the war and the PATRIOT Act. Kerry has even intimated that he would maintain the occupation in Iraq for a longer period than the Bush administration would. A Kerry victory would mean little for social liberals.
At the same time, those of us who are concerned about federal spending have no reason to fear a Kerry victory, despite the fact that Kerry's domestic policy proposals are mostly worse than those of George W. Bush. Federal spending rose faster under Bush than it did under Clinton, proving once again the virtues of divided government. A President Kerry would be unable to pass his more radical proposals in the face of Republican congressional opposition. A Bush victory would mean little for fiscal conservatives.
Whether Bush or Kerry wins is of marginal importance, and it is more appropriate in this election to cast a vote for long-term, fundamental change, which growing third-party support could ultimately effect.

[default homepage]

[print][

2:39:22am Jun 08,2024
load time 0.00650 secs/10 queries]

[search]

[refresh page]